B. Tο συνολικό κείμενο της απόφασης του Δικαστηρίου της Χάγης για το Σκοπιανό 5-11-2011

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
 173
 
  5 DECEMBER 2011 JUDGMENT APPLICATION OF THE INTERIM ACCORD OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1995 (THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA v. GREECE) ___________ APPLICATION DE L’ACCORD INTÉRIMAIRE DU 13 SEPTEMBRE 1995 (EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACÉDOINE c. GRÈCE) 5 DÉCEMBRE 2011 ARRÊT TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE I. INTRODUCTION II. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE APPLICATION 1. Whether the dispute is excluded from the Court’s jurisdiction under the terms
Share
Transcript
  5 DECEMBER 2011JUDGMENTAPPLICATION OF THE INTERIM ACCORD OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1995   (THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA v. GREECE)___________APPLICATION DE L’ACCORD INTÉRIMAIRE DU 13 SEPTEMBRE 1995(EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACÉDOINE c. GRÈCE)5 DÉCEMBRE 2011ARRÊT    T ABLE OF C ONTENTS   Paragraphs C HRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-14I. I NTRODUCTION 15-22II. J URISDICTION OF THE C OURT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE A PPLICATION 23-611. Whether the dispute is excluded from the Court’s jurisdictionunder the terms of Article 21, paragraph 2, of the Interim Accord,read in conjunction with Article 5, paragraph 1 28-382. Whether the dispute relates to the conduct of NATO or itsMember States and whether the Court’s decision could affecttheir rights and obligations 39-443. Whether the Court’s Judgment would be incapable of effectiveapplication 45-544. Whether the Court’s Judgment would interfere with ongoingdiplomatic negotiations 55-605. Conclusion concerning the jurisdiction of the Court over thepresent dispute and the admissibility of the Application 61III. W HETHER THE R ESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THEOBLIGATION UNDER A RTICLE 11, PARAGRAPH 1, OF THE I NTERIM A CCORD 62-1131. The Respondent’s obligation under Article 11, paragraph 1, of theInterim Accord not to object to the Applicant’s admission toNATO 67-83A. The meaning of the first clause of Article 11, paragraph 1, of the InterimAccord 67-71B. Whether the Respondent “objected” to the Applicant’sadmission to NATO 72-832. The effect of the second clause of Article 11, paragraph 1, of theInterim Accord 84-1033. Article 22 of the Interim Accord 104-1124. Conclusion concerning whether the Respondent failed to complywith Article 11, paragraph 1, of the Interim Accord 113  - ii -IV. A DDITIONAL JUSTIFICATIONS INVOKED BY THE R ESPONDENT 114-1641. The Parties’ arguments with regard to the Respondent’s additional justifications 115-122A. The Parties’ arguments with regard to the exceptio nonadimpleti contractus 115-117B. The Parties’ arguments with regard to a response to materialbreach 118-119C. The Parties’ arguments with regard to countermeasures 120-1222. The Respondent’s allegations that the Applicant failed to complywith its obligations under the Interim Accord 123-160A. Alleged breach by the Applicant of the second clause of Article 11, paragraph 1 124-126B. Alleged breach by the Applicant of Article 5, paragraph 1 127-138C. Alleged breach by the Applicant of Article 6, paragraph 2 139-142D. Alleged breach by the Applicant of Article 7, paragraph 1 143-147E. Alleged breach by the Applicant of Article 7, paragraph 2 148-153F. Alleged breach by the Applicant of Article 7, paragraph 3154-1603. Conclusions concerning the Respondent’s additional justifications 161-164A. Conclusion concerning the exceptio non adimpleticontractus 161B. Conclusion concerning a response to material breach 162-163C. Conclusion concerning countermeasures 164-165V. R EMEDIES 167-169O PERATIVE CLAUSE 170___________    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICEYEAR 201120115 DecemberGeneral ListNo. 1425 December 2011APPLICATION OF THE INTERIM ACCORD OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1995(THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA v. GREECE)  Historical context and srcin of the dispute. Break-up of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ⎯  Application for membership inUnited Nations submitted by Applicant on 30 July 1992 ⎯  Opposition of Respondent to Applicant’s admission ⎯  Security Council resolution 817 (1993) ⎯  Applicant admitted tomembership in United Nations under provisional designation of  “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”   ⎯  Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 ⎯  Applicant’s NATO candidacy considered at Bucharest Summit on 2 and 3 April 2008 ⎯  Applicant not invited to begin talks on accession to NATO. *  Jurisdiction of the Court and admissibility of Application.Scope of dispute ⎯  Article 21, paragraph 2, of Interim Accord, as a basis for the Court’s jurisdiction. Respondent’s first objection to jurisdiction ⎯  Contention that dispute is excluded from theCourt’s jurisdiction under Article 21, paragraph 2 ⎯  Article 21, paragraph 2, excludes disputesregarding the difference over the definitive name ⎯  Disputes regarding Respondent’s obligationunder Article 11, paragraph 1, within the Court’s jurisdiction ⎯  Objection cannot be upheld.
Related Search
Similar documents
View more
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks